Curia is the workspace, not the chatbot. Research, document analysis, matter timelines, and drafting live in one place — grounded in Ontario law, cited line-by-line, and wired into the way litigation actually gets done.

Ontario courts apply the Red Deer College standard, but for long-tenure senior executives the bar sits noticeably higher — Peet v. Babcock and Lake v. La Presse treat an unreasonable two-to-three month search as the floor, not the rule.
For a 14-year VP with industry-specific compensation, courts have consistently credited six to nine months of search activity without reduction.
Every legal AI tool is a chatbot bolted onto search. Curia is the opposite: a full workspace where research, documents, matter state, and draft output share the same memory.
We built it for one jurisdiction, not fifty. Ontario case law. Ontario procedure. Ontario forms. Because generic almost-correct is worse than specific and known.
Ask a question. Upload a statement of claim. Open a matter. Same workspace. Same context. No re-explaining who your client is across six tabs.
Follow one real question as it moves through Curia — research grounded in Ontario cases, documents auto-analyzed into the matter timeline, then drafted with live citations back to source.
Every matter is a live workspace: timeline, documents, research sessions, drafts, and tasks under one spine. Ask “what do I need to do on Okafor this week?” — Curia knows.
Dates pulled from documents and pleadings become a navigable matter timeline. Spot gaps before the other side does.
No hallucinated citations. Every authority Curia returns exists, sits in its real context, and is one click from the source paragraph.
Not autocomplete. Drafting writes structured work product — facta, letters, memos — with pincite citations you can defend.
The plaintiff submits that the threshold of “reasonable mitigation efforts” is a contextual inquiry Red Deer College, not a rigid proof of ninety-day outreach.
Drop an expert report. Curia identifies methodological weaknesses, contradictions with the medical record, and cross-examination angles worth trying.
Search by plaintiff profile, injury type, venue, and year. Curia returns the 8–15 comparables that actually match — then projects a defensible settlement range you can take into mediation.
Bench analytics across Ontario and federal jurists. Plaintiff verdict rates, median general damages, summary judgment grant rates, typical motion-to-decision timelines. Know what you're walking into before you draft the notice.
Other tools spread thin across every jurisdiction. Curia goes deep on one. Everything below is built into the workspace by default — no integrations, no “coming soon,” no disclaimer you have to remember in motion practice.
No tiers to compare. No features locked behind upgrades. Start free and upgrade when you’re ready.
Five free credits to test it on a real matter. No credit card.